http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/529/hammering-away-in-the-perl-toolchain-smithy/ Whatever comes to mind Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:43:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/529/hammering-away-in-the-perl-toolchain-smithy/comment-page-1/#comment-2790 dagolden Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:11:57 +0000 http://www.dagolden.com/?p=529#comment-2790 I suspect they'll be maintained in parallel. It's actually been helpful in diagnosing certain problems since CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS have different implementations. Plus, some friendly feature competition has meant that both continue to improve over time. I suspect they'll be maintained in parallel. It's actually been helpful in diagnosing certain problems since CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS have different implementations. Plus, some friendly feature competition has meant that both continue to improve over time.

]]> http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/529/hammering-away-in-the-perl-toolchain-smithy/comment-page-1/#comment-2789 John Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:01:42 +0000 http://www.dagolden.com/?p=529#comment-2789 I've been using CPANPLUS ever since it looked like it was going to replace CPAN.pm. I'm curious, do you think CPANPLUS will eventually eclipse CPAN.pm, or will the two modules be forever maintained in parallel? I've been using CPANPLUS ever since it looked like it was going to replace CPAN.pm. I'm curious, do you think CPANPLUS will eventually eclipse CPAN.pm, or will the two modules be forever maintained in parallel?

]]>